Chapel & Tuck
← All schools

School report

Example School

England · Co-educational · 720 pupils

Peer group: 500-999 pupils, England

Notes

Example School is a fictional demonstration profile. Every figure, source link and inspection detail below is invented to show how a complete Chapel & Tuck report reads — it is not a real school, and its own links point to example.com. The national benchmark lines on the results charts use the real Ofqual/JCQ series.

At a glance

Latest income

£24.8m

Year 2024/25

Reserves

14.0

months of spending

Fee dependency

86%

of income from fees

Operating stress

99%

of peers are more stretched

Inspection

Green

ISI · 2024-03-15

Fees

Fees

What Example School publishes for 2026/27 — the advertised price, before any bursary or scholarship.

2026/27VAT included
DayBoarding
Senior
£30,000 /yr
£10,000/term
£48,000 /yr
£16,000/term
Sixth Form
£31,500 /yr
£10,500/term
£50,400 /yr
£16,800/term
Weekly boarding: £44,000/yr
Average actually paid: £29,000 per pupil. Derived from the school's accounts — blended across day and boarding pupils and net of bursaries, scholarships and sibling discounts, so it usually sits below the advertised fees above.

Termly figures are the annual fee ÷ 3. Source: the school's fee page ↗ — Illustrative fees for the fictional Example School — figures include VAT (2026/27).

Finances

How it compares

Against schools of 500-999 pupils. The shaded band is the typical peer range (middle 50%); the dot is this school.

Reserves (months)14.0ahead of peers

Typical peers 6.7 to 17.6 · median 12.9

Fee dependency86%ahead of peers

Typical peers 90% to 97% · median 94%

Operating surplus2.0%ahead of peers

Typical peers -6.6% to 1.5% · median -2.1%

Staff costs (% of spend)1%

Typical peers 59% to 66% · median 62% · this school sits beyond that range

Reinvestment (capex : depreciation)1.4×ahead of peers

Typical peers 0.5× to 1.7× · median 1.0×

Spend per pupil£33kahead of peers

Typical peers £22k to £36k · median £28k

Data completeness1far behind peers

Typical peers 100 to 100 · median 100 · this school sits beyond that range

Source: Charity Commission / OSCR filed accounts; peer groups computed across the dataset.

Financial position

Balance-sheet strengthStrong

Free reserves cover 14.0 mo · endowment £18.0m · total funds £42.0m

Operating resultSurplus

Latest year £1.3m (5.2% of income) · income +4.8%/yr

Comfortable reserves and an operating surplus — a secure position.

Two indicators, not a verdict — check the figures at source above.

Income & expenditure

Five-year trend from filed accounts.

IncomeExpenditure
2020/21
2021/22
2022/23
2023/24
2024/25

Latest income

£24.8m

Latest spend

£23.5m

Latest result

£1.3m

Years on record

5

Source: Charity Commission / OSCR annual returns.

Where the surplus comes from

Each line as a share of fee income — the clearest read on whether the school pays its way.

Operating surplus
2.0%
Trading & fundraising
1.0%
Structural (investments)
2.0%
Bottom line
3.0%

3% is the healthy guide

Overall margin
5.2%

of total income

Source: parsed filed accounts (Charity Commission / OSCR).

Spending breakdown

From the school’s filed accounts.

Staff costs£13.4m

1% of total spending goes on staff · ~232 employees.

That’s 1% of fee income.

Reinvestment

Capital spend

£2.5m

Depreciation

£1.8m

1.4× capex : depreciation investing in buildings faster than they wear out. Peers typically 1.0×.

Reinvestment ratio: 140.0% of fee income spent on capital.

Source: parsed Charity Commission / OSCR accounts.

Per pupil & bursaries

From filed accounts and pupil numbers.

Net fee yield (est.)
£29,000

per pupil

Spend per pupil
£32,600
Staff-to-pupil ratio
1:3.1

all roles · headcount

Capex per pupil
£3,470
Bursary support
0.1%

of fee income

Income trend (3yr)
+4.8%/yr

Source: Charity Commission / OSCR; pupil counts from inspection records.

Peer-group benchmarking

Benchmark against a peer group you build

Choose the cohort — nation, size, fee band, gender, boarding — and this school's ratios re-benchmark against that group's median and quartiles, live.

Inspection & safeguarding

Green· ISINo concerns raised

Latest outcome: Excellent

Regulator
ISI
Band
Green
Report date
2024-03-15
Report age
1.3 years

Inspectorates use different scales, so bands are shown only within their own regime, never cross-mapped.

Academic results

Exam results

Published results for Example School over time. Where a national figure exists it is shown alongside, for context only — the 2021 outlier reflects that year's teacher-assessed grades across the country, not this school.

Value added & progress — as the school reports it

Schools measure value added in different ways (ALPS, DfE, CEM and others), so these figures are not comparable between schools. Shown as reported, not as a score.

  • The school reports: an ALPS value-added score of 2 at A-level in 2025, which it places in the top decile nationally. source

In the school's own words

Context the school publishes that isn't a like-for-like figure — shown as quoted, never plotted or compared.

  • 2025 · In 2025, 67% of GCSE entries were graded 9–7 and every pupil passed at least eight subjects. source

Source: each school's own published results; national series from Ofqual / JCQ. Hover a point for its source; click to open it.

Leavers' destinations

Where leavers go next, as each school reports it. Schools define and publish these differently, so they're shown as sourced statements — not compared between schools.

2025

  • 2025 destinations: 9 places at Oxford or Cambridge, and 62% of leavers to Russell Group universities. source
  • 2025: 11 leavers progressing to Medicine, Dentistry or Veterinary Science. source

2024

  • 2024 destinations: 7 places at Oxford or Cambridge, with leavers also taking up places at Imperial, UCL and Edinburgh. source

2023

  • 2023: leavers took up places in the US (including two Ivy League offers) and the Netherlands. source

Source: each school's own published destinations.

Curriculum & activities

Subjects

What Example School offers — the subjects on the timetable, not exam performance or how many pupils take each one.

Source: each school's own curriculum pages. Click a subject to open the page it was listed on.

Activities

The co-curricular activities Example School publishes, grouped by kind. A list of what's offered — not a score: a longer list often just means a school lists more, not that it does more.

Source: each school's own website. Click an activity to open the page it was listed on.

Catchment

Who lives nearby.

Catchment demographics

These are fictional sample schools, so no catchment data is shown — a real map would give away the school’s actual location. On a live profile, this section maps the demographics of the drive-time catchment (population, age mix, education, occupation and ethnicity), drawn from the 2021 Census.

Data & sources

Where these figures come from, and how complete they are.

Financial source
Demonstration data
Detail level
Parsed from full accounts
Latest accounts
2025-08-31
Years on record
5
Accounts age
6 months
Pupil numbers
720 (School census (demonstration))
Components
complete
Entity scope
This school
Data completeness1/100

Computed 2026-07-15 · pipeline demo. Indicators, not verdicts — each is traceable to its source.

Your notes

Sign in to keep private, timestamped notes on a school as you research it.

Sign in

Prototype — figures derive from public records (Charity Commission, OSCR, ISI/Ofsted/Education Scotland/Estyn, ONS Census). Some fields (pupil–teacher ratios) are not yet in the dataset and are omitted rather than estimated.