School report
School B
England · Co-educational · 511 pupils
At a glance
Latest income
£11.8m
Year 2023/24
Reserves
How many months the school could keep running on its savings if its income stopped. More months means a larger safety net.16.3
months of spending
Fee dependency
How much the school relies on fees versus other income. A school funded almost entirely by fees has less of a cushion if pupil numbers fall.93%
of income from fees
Operating stress
How financially stretched this school looks next to similar schools — based on its reserves, whether it runs a surplus or deficit, its income trend and how much it relies on fees. About 64% of comparable schools look more stretched than it, so a higher number is healthier. It's a relative measure, not a verdict.64%
of peers are more stretched
Inspection
A colour summarising the school's most recent inspection outcome. Different inspectorates (ISI, Ofsted, and the Scottish and Welsh bodies) use different systems, so results from different inspectorates aren't directly comparable.Green
ISI · 2025-02-04
Fees
Fees
What School B publishes for 2025/26 — the advertised price, before any bursary or scholarship.
| Day | Boarding | |
|---|---|---|
| Prep | £19,500 /yr ≈ £6,500/term | — |
| Senior | £29,550 /yr ≈ £9,850/term | £46,350 /yr ≈ £15,450/term |
| Sixth Form | £31,200 /yr ≈ £10,400/term | £48,750 /yr ≈ £16,250/term |
Termly figures are the annual fee ÷ 3.
Full boarding fees have risen +50.1% since 2021/22 — from £31,950 to £47,970 in 2026/27. Latest figure includes VAT. See the full six-year trend below.
Fee history
How this school’s published fee has moved over the last six academic years.
darker points are the years private-school VAT applies (from January 2025); the dashed line marks its onset.
A blank is unknown, not zero. Compare only like stage, mode and year. Annualised or reconstructed figures are marked “derived” on hover, and VAT is only stated for 2025/26 onward.
Source: each school’s own published fee schedules and public web archives.
Finances
How it compares
Against schools of 500-999 pupils. The shaded band is the typical peer range (middle 50%); the dot is this school.
Typical peers 6.7 to 17.6 · median 12.9
Typical peers 90% to 97% · median 94%
Typical peers -6.6% to 1.5% · median -2.1%
Typical peers 59% to 66% · median 62%
Typical peers 0.5× to 1.7× · median 1.0×
Typical peers £22k to £36k · median £28k
Typical peers 100 to 100 · median 100
Source: Charity Commission / OSCR filed accounts; peer groups computed across the dataset.
Financial position
A simple green, amber or red rating summarising how financially secure a school looks, based on its published accounts. Green is reassuring; red suggests taking a closer look. It's an indicator, not a verdict.Free reserves cover 16.3 mo · endowment £251k · total funds £16.3m
Latest year £193k (1.6% of income) · income +7.6%/yr
Comfortable reserves and an operating surplus — a secure position.
Two indicators, not a verdict.
Income & expenditure
Five-year trend from filed accounts.
Latest income
£11.8m
Latest spend
£11.6m
Latest result
£193k
Years on record
5
Source: Charity Commission / OSCR annual returns.
Where the surplus comes from
Each line as a share of fee income — the clearest read on whether the school pays its way.
10% is the healthy guide
of total income
Source: parsed filed accounts (Charity Commission / OSCR).
Spending breakdown
From the school’s filed accounts.
68% of total spending goes on staff · ~164 employees.
That’s 66% of fee income.
ReinvestmentHow much a school spends on improving its buildings and facilities relative to its fee income — a sign of whether it's investing in its future.
Capital spend
£385k
Depreciation
£558k
0.7× capex : depreciation — spending less on buildings than they depreciate. Peers typically 1.0×.
Reinvestment ratio: 3.5% of fee income spent on capital.
Source: parsed Charity Commission / OSCR accounts.
Per pupil & bursaries
From filed accounts and pupil numbers.
per pupil
all roles · headcount
of fee income
Source: Charity Commission / OSCR; pupil counts from inspection records.
Peer-group benchmarking
Benchmark against a peer group you build
Choose the cohort — nation, size, fee band, gender, boarding — and this school's ratios re-benchmark against that group's median and quartiles, live.
Inspection & safeguarding
Latest outcome: all met
- Regulator
- ISI
- Band
- Green
- Report date
- 2025-02-04
- Report age
- 1.4 years
Inspectorates use different scales, so bands are shown only within their own regime, never cross-mapped.
Academic results
Exam results
Published results for School B over time. Where a national figure exists it is shown alongside, for context only — the 2021 outlier reflects that year's teacher-assessed grades across the country, not this school.
GCSE 9-7
This schoolNational · Ofqual GCSE outcomes, all subjects
GCSE 9-4
This schoolNational · Ofqual GCSE outcomes, all subjects
A-level A*-A
This schoolNational · Ofqual/JCQ A-level outcomes, all subjects
A-level A*-B
This schoolNational · JCQ A-level outcomes, all subjects
A-level pass rate
A-level A*
Value added & progress — as the school reports it
Schools measure value added in different ways (ALPS, DfE, CEM and others), so these figures are not comparable between schools. Shown as reported, not as a score.
- The school reports: 2024 GCSE: 82% of results on or above Yellis predicted grades
Source: each school's own published results; national series from Ofqual / JCQ. Hover a point for its source; click to open it.
Leavers' destinations
Where leavers go next, as each school reports it. Schools define and publish these differently, so they're shown as sourced statements — not compared between schools.
2025
- 2025 outcomes: 35% Russell Group applicant outcome
2024
- 2024 selective US destinations include Nottingham, Cornell
Source: each school's own published destinations.
Curriculum & activities
Subjects
What School B offers — the subjects on the timetable, not exam performance or how many pupils take each one.
Years 7–9
GCSE
BTEC / vocational
A-level
Source: each school's own curriculum pages. Click a subject to open the page it was listed on.
Activities
The co-curricular activities School B publishes, grouped by kind. A list of what's offered — not a score: a longer list often just means a school lists more, not that it does more.
Sport
Clubs
Productions
Activities
Trips
Events
Other
Source: each school's own website. Click an activity to open the page it was listed on.
Language & character
What the school emphasises
The co-curricular activities School B mentions most on its website — sized by how often each comes up. A signal of what the school chooses to foreground, not a full list of what's on offer (see Activities for that).
Source: the school's own website (language extraction, reviewed but not a verified provision list).
In their own words
The most distinctive language on School B's website — sized by how strongly it stands out (how often it's used and how rare it is elsewhere) and coloured by theme. Hover a term for its mention count and source; click to see where it was found.
A reviewed language map — filtered and ranked, not a raw word cloud. Source: the school's own website.
What the inspection emphasises
How the inspection report divides its attention across themes, compared with the average school — a fairer read than raw word frequency, since every inspectorate leans on the same core vocabulary.
Compared with the average school, this inspection dwells more on Safeguarding and Leadership & Character, and notably less on Pastoral & Wellbeing and Careers & Futures.
e.g. Respect, Community, Confidence
e.g. Boarding, Boarding House, Inclusive Boarding Community
e.g. Safety, Safer Recruitment, Risk Assessment
e.g. Academic, Literacy, Subject Knowledge
e.g. Music, Dance, Extra-Curricular Activity
e.g. Inclusion, Inclusive, Cultural Diversity
Share of themed mentions in the school's published inspection report. The tick marks the average across all schools. Colour is a label, not a judgement.
The school's words vs the inspectors'
How the language on School B's website lines up with its inspection report — which of its themes the inspectors echo, and which they don't.
Backed up by the inspection
School B highlights these on its own site, and the inspectors emphasise them too.
The school highlights — the inspection doesn't
Promoted on the school's site but not picked up in the inspection report. Inspections don't cover everything, so this isn't a criticism — just an unmatched claim.
Raised by the inspectors independently
Emphasised in the inspection, but not foregrounded on the school's own site.
Website terms are matched to inspection-report terms. Each links to the source where it was found.
Catchment
Who lives nearby.
Catchment demographics
These are fictional sample schools, so no catchment data is shown — a real map would give away the school’s actual location. On a live profile, this section maps the demographics of the drive-time catchment (population, age mix, education, occupation and ethnicity), drawn from the 2021 Census.
Data & sources
Where these figures come from, and how complete they are.
- Financial source
- Charity Commission (England & Wales)
- Detail level
- Parsed from full accounts
- Latest accounts
- 2024-07-31
- Years on record
- 5
- Accounts age
- 22 months
- Pupil numbers
- 511 (inspection:ISI)
- Components
- Income components reconcile
- Entity scope
- This school
Pupil–teacher ratio: not published — independent schools aren’t in the DfE workforce census, and filed accounts don’t separate teaching staff.
Capital trend: only one year of capital spend is on record, so a multi-year under-investment signal can’t be computed yet.
Computed 2026-06-20 · pipeline ct-derived-1.0.0. Indicators, not verdicts — each is traceable to its source.
Your notes
Sign in to keep private, timestamped notes on a school as you research it.
Sign inPrototype — figures derive from public records (Charity Commission, OSCR, ISI/Ofsted/Education Scotland/Estyn, ONS Census). Some fields (pupil–teacher ratios) are not yet in the dataset and are omitted rather than estimated.